And it raises an obvious question: if cows can be tokenized, what can\u2019t be?<\/p>\n
From dairy cows to a year\u2019s worth of farts, here are 10 of the strangest things to be tokenized onchain.<\/p>\n
1. A year\u2019s worth of farts<\/h2>\n
When BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink said<\/a> every asset will eventually be tokenized, he probably wasn\u2019t thinking about flatulence. Yet, that\u2019s exactly what happened here.Every bit as appealing as, well, a year\u2019s worth of farts, it has to be a contender for the strangest thingever to make it onchain.<\/p>\n It was during the pandemic, when most people were baking bread or leveling up on Duolingo, that filmmaker Alex Ram\u00edrez-Mallis recorded<\/a> his own farts and minted each one as a nonfungible token (NFT).<\/p>\n They say farts are like children, and you only love your own. But the novelty factor meant that Ram\u00edrez-Mallis was able to sell his for 0.05 ETH each (about $85 at the time), proving that every asset has its price.<\/p>\n Better known as a prime source of protein in Bitcoin circles, the idea of turning 10 Brazilian cows into tokenized cattle… er, tokenized collateral, is not the most obvious use case. <\/p>\n The deal was structured by Brazilian investment fund Target FIDC, giving each cow a unique digital token linked to an encrypted digital identity.<\/p>\n Larry Fink says every asset can be tokenized. Source: BlackRock<\/em><\/p>\n The first loan may have been worth just $19,600, but it was a proof of concept that shows the potential to eventually support<\/a> around $80 million in livestock-backed financing across its farms. <\/p>\n While it sounds somewhat bizarre on first glance, the agriculture industry generated<\/a> around $4 trillion in global value added in 2023, so watch out for tokenized sheep, goats and chickens as collateral next.<\/p>\n When you think of sharing a whiskey, you probably have the liquid gold kind in mind, but whiskey barrels are a natural candidate for tokenization.<\/p>\n Related: <\/strong><\/em>Tokenized RWAs get an agent-ready research layer with a new protocol<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n That\u2019s because, like high-end art and collectibles, Scotch whisky typically increases in value as it matures \u2014 talk about lifting your spirits! <\/p>\n Several projects are experimenting with putting whisky casks onchain so investors can buy whole units or fractional ownership of tokenized whisky stored in bonded warehouses. <\/p>\n Just remember that if the market crashes, you can\u2019t actually drink a digital JPEG of a barrel.<\/p>\n Racehorse ownership has long been reserved for the ultra-wealthy, those with deep enough pockets to cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in breeding, training and upkeep, and a fancy hat to wear at the racetrack.<\/p>\n But tokenization is beginning to chip away at those elitist barriers, dividing<\/a> ownership of real thoroughbred racehorses into digital shares.<\/p>\n Investors can buy a stake in an animal and share in any prize money, breeding income, or future sale proceeds, without purchasing an entire horse.<\/p>\n Own part of a racehorse. Source: Stablemans<\/em><\/p>\n A word of caution for would-be investors in this style of asset, though, whether its watches or whiskeys or large four legged animals, from Chris Turner, co-founder of impact investment firm KULA:<\/p>\n \u201cPutting a collectible or luxury item on a blockchain doesn\u2019t automatically make it more liquid or valuable if the legal rights, transfer process, and market structure remain unchanged.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n If your mind turns to treasuries and private credit when thinking about tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), it might be a shift to consider uranium, the radioactive metal better known for its role in nuclear power.<\/p>\n But that\u2019s what Tezos-backed metals.io is doing. Tezos co-founder Arthur Breitman says blockchain technology excels at building \u201creliable, auditable and cost-efficient financial rails for any asset,\u201d but is particularly aligned with \u201ctechnology-flavored commodities\u201d like uranium.<\/p>\n Breitman says trading volume between November 2024 and July 2026 was $21.5 million over approximately 18,200 trades and around 7,400 unique wallets.<\/p>\n Related: <\/strong><\/em>RWAs become Hyperliquid\u2019s largest trading category<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n He acknowledges that growth remains modest, telling Magazine that institutional players have shown interest but are \u201cstill shy about tokenized rails.\u201d <\/p>\n One of the most unusual proposals tokenization platform Brickken received came from a Chilean fish-processing company that wanted to issue tokenized debt with returns tied to the value of the fish it sold. <\/p>\n \u201cThe token represented the lender\u2019s contractual claim, while the interest payable adjusted according to the company\u2019s verified sales performance. In effect, it was a tokenized, revenue-linked debt instrument,\u201d explains Edwin Mata, chief executive of Brickken.<\/p>\n Mata argues that the idea highlights an important principle:<\/p>\n \u201cAlmost any cash flow can support a tokenized financial instrument, provided the underlying rights and data can be independently verified.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In the end, the fish never made it onchain. The underlying fish sales still relied on audits, commercial reporting and legal agreements that couldn\u2019t yet be automated, proving that, sometimes, the biggest obstacle to tokenization isn\u2019t the blockchain; it\u2019s the real world. <\/p>\n Music royalties have also found their way onchain, with one of the earliest high-profile examples in 2021, when DJ and producer 3LAU gave fans 50% of the streaming rights to his single Worst Case through his blockchain platform Royal<\/a>.<\/p>\n Then, in 2022, rapper Nas used<\/a> Royal to sell streaming royalty rights to two of his songs, Ultra Black and Rare.<\/p>\n While the idea of onchain royalties gained<\/a> traction during the NFT boom, tokenized music royalties have yet to become a mainstream asset class. Maybe that\u2019s because the streaming platforms pay peanuts. <\/p>\n Nothing says \u201cfinancial freedom\u201d quite like owning 0.001% of a track and realizing it needs to be played five million times just to buy a cup of coffee. <\/p>\n If tokenizing farts and cattle wasn\u2019t weird enough, what about parts of your own body? That\u2019s exactly what Croatian tennis player Oleksandra Oliynykova did in 2021, when she auctioned<\/a> the advertising rights to a 15-by-18-centimeter patch of skin on her right arm as an NFT. <\/p>\n The winning bidder paid 3 Ether (around $5,400 at the time) for the right to choose which tattoo she would wear during tournaments for a year.<\/p>\n Athletes have long sold sponsorship space on shirts, helmets and race cars. Oliynykova just took the idea one step further, giving a whole new meaning to having skin in the game.<\/p>\n Most art collectors try to preserve masterpieces; crypto collectors set them on fire to make a point about \u201cdigital ownership.\u201d In 2021, a group calling itself Burnt Banksy bought<\/a> a Banksy print titled Morons (White) for around $95,000. They livestreamed themselves burning it, and then minted the destruction.<\/p>\n If that leaves you scratching your head, there was method in the madness; the idea was that while the physical artwork no longer existed, ownership would live on forever through the blockchain. <\/p>\n The NFT sold for around $382,000, sparking fierce debate over whether the group had destroyed a valuable work of art or simply transformed it into a new one. It was probably the first time in history someone made a 300% profit from a \u201cfire sale.\u201d<\/p>\n Also in the year of our NFT Lord, 2021, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey tokenized his first-ever tweet \u2014 \u201cjust setting up my twttr\u201d \u2014 and sold it as an NFT to crypto entrepreneur Sina Estavi for $2.9 million, quickly becoming a symbol of the NFT boom. <\/p>\n The first-ever tweet sold for $2.9 million. Source: Jack Dorsey<\/em><\/p>\n One year later, Estavi tried to resell it for $48 million, but only received bids worth a tiny fraction of the asking price, with the highest reported<\/a> offer coming in at just $6,800.<\/p>\n While anyone can still read<\/a> the tweet on X, only one person owns the blockchain certificate tied to it. Whether that\u2019s valuable or not remains an open question. As Mata says:<\/p>\n \u201cTokenization can improve access, administration, settlement and transferability, but it cannot transform a poor investment into a good one.\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote>\n Magazine: <\/strong><\/em>The 100x obsession: Fundamentals grow in importance as crypto matures<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n Related:<\/strong> Bitcoin price<\/a> \u00b7 BTC live chart<\/a> \u00b7 Ethereum price<\/a> \u00b7 ETH gas fee<\/a> \u00b7 Bitcoin price today<\/a> \u00b7 Top 10 cryptocurrencies<\/a><\/p>\n2. Cows<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/s3-images.ctmedia.io\/media\/content\/lf.png\")
<\/p>\n3. Whiskey barrels<\/h2>\n
4. Racehorses<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/s3-images.ctmedia.io\/media\/content\/stablemans.png\")
<\/p>\n5. Uranium<\/h2>\n
6. Fishy revenue<\/h2>\n
7. Music royalties<\/h2>\n
8. Human Skin<\/h2>\n
9. A Burned Banksy<\/h2>\n
10. The first tweet<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/s3-images.ctmedia.io\/media\/content\/tweet-6.png\")
<\/p>\n